The divorce rate is around 50%.
And the marriage? Mostly seems to be about the picture perfect wedding... the bride... the dress... the ring... the honeymoon photos for their social media... but not the marriage.
So many in the 35 and under age group right now aren't even bothering to get married. Just date, have sex with numerous people, live together, have kids together with numerous people and move on. Which is a whole other topic.
I saw this while scrolling some social media and stopped to listen... very good points.
You aren't just marrying that 'person' but all their habits and personality traits too. :)
Interesting. Sounds a lot like the Clintons. And Obama (on a smaller scale so far).
In the three years immediately following the assassination of President Kennedy, a documented pattern emerged among the people identified as material witnesses to the events surrounding his death.
103 of them died under circumstances that investigators, researchers, and journalists described as suspicious, premature, or violent — at rates significantly above what normal actuarial tables would predict for a defined group of people in that age range and demographic.
In 1967, the London Sunday Times commissioned a professional British actuary — an expert in statistical probability whose specific professional function is calculating the likelihood of events within defined populations — to analyze this pattern mathematically. The calculation the actuary produced: the statistical probability of that many material witnesses in a defined group dying in that specific three-year timeframe was approximately one in 100,000,000,000,000. One in one hundred thousand trillion.
The London Sunday Times published the calculation as part of an investigative feature.
The story was subsequently retracted. The Sunday Times later issued a statement saying the original calculation had been based on a misunderstanding of the methodology. Critics of the retraction have noted that it followed significant pressure on the paper's editors. The specific nature and source of that pressure was never publicly disclosed.
The statistical argument itself has been challenged by researchers who dispute aspects of the methodology — those debates are legitimate and ongoing among historians and mathematicians.
But here is what no one disputes: 103 people with documented material connections to the Kennedy assassination died in a defined three-year period. Each death has a name. Each has a documented cause. Each can be researched individually.
A newspaper published a mathematical analysis suggesting the pattern was impossible by chance. Then retracted it. The retraction was never given the same coverage as the original story.
103 of them died under circumstances that investigators, researchers, and journalists described as suspicious, premature, or violent — at rates significantly above what normal actuarial tables would predict for a defined group of people in that age range and demographic.
In 1967, the London Sunday Times commissioned a professional British actuary — an expert in statistical probability whose specific professional function is calculating the likelihood of events within defined populations — to analyze this pattern mathematically. The calculation the actuary produced: the statistical probability of that many material witnesses in a defined group dying in that specific three-year timeframe was approximately one in 100,000,000,000,000. One in one hundred thousand trillion.
The London Sunday Times published the calculation as part of an investigative feature.
The story was subsequently retracted. The Sunday Times later issued a statement saying the original calculation had been based on a misunderstanding of the methodology. Critics of the retraction have noted that it followed significant pressure on the paper's editors. The specific nature and source of that pressure was never publicly disclosed.
The statistical argument itself has been challenged by researchers who dispute aspects of the methodology — those debates are legitimate and ongoing among historians and mathematicians.
But here is what no one disputes: 103 people with documented material connections to the Kennedy assassination died in a defined three-year period. Each death has a name. Each has a documented cause. Each can be researched individually.
A newspaper published a mathematical analysis suggesting the pattern was impossible by chance. Then retracted it. The retraction was never given the same coverage as the original story.
I chuckled. This is a screenshot from a social media video.
This is 100%. OMG.
If you haven't done any research and pondering into the evil that is Erica Kirk, you should.
What a background!!!!
If you haven't done any research and pondering into the evil that is Erica Kirk, you should.
What a background!!!!
It's always the white guys who want to help people.
All these trans people committing mass shootings, violence... but, mental illness so, yeah.
