Pondering over... diet soda. It's afternoon. And it's hot. And my soda is icy cold.

 

 

 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Two days before President Kennedy was shot in Dallas, he signed National Security Action Memorandum 263.

NSAM 263 formally authorized the withdrawal of 1,000 US military advisors from Vietnam by the end of 1963, with a plan for complete withdrawal completed by 1965. Kennedy had been privately skeptical of deepening US military involvement in Southeast Asia for over a year. He had resisted sustained pressure from the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA to commit to direct combat operations. He had told aides privately and on record that he would not allow Vietnam to become what Korea had been.

November 22, 1963: Kennedy is shot in Dallas.

November 26, 1963 — five days later: President Lyndon Johnson signs National Security Action Memorandum 273, which effectively reverses Kennedy's withdrawal order and recommits the United States to supporting the South Vietnamese government through military means.

The Vietnam War continued for twelve more years. 58,220 American soldiers died. Estimates of Vietnamese civilian deaths range from 1.5 to 3.5 million people.

At the time of his assassination, Kennedy was also conducting secret back-channel negotiations with Fidel Castro through a UN intermediary. He was actively challenging the CIA's operational autonomy. He was in public confrontation with the military establishment over defense spending. He had told trusted aides he wanted to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces."

The interests most directly, immediately, and financially threatened by John F. Kennedy's governing agenda in the final months of 1963: the CIA, the military-industrial complex, and the defense contractors who required the Vietnam conflict to continue and expand.

Five days after his death, the Vietnam withdrawal order was gone. Twelve years. 58,000 American lives. Trillions of dollars in defense contracts. 

 

 


A former Pfizer VP just broke his silence—and what he’s revealing changes everything.
When an industry insider this high up blows the whistle, you have to stop and listen. Dr. Mike Yeadon, who served as a Vice President at Pfizer for 16 years, is coming forward with a chilling alternative perspective on the events that shook the world.

He isn't just questioning the narrative—he is completely dismantling it.

According to Dr. Yeadon, the timeline we were given simply doesn’t add up. He claims it is scientifically impossible to develop a new vaccine technology safely in such a short window, suggesting the framework for these mRNA shots was established long before anyone ever heard of Covid-19.

The carousel highlights his most intense claims:

  1. The "Planned" Event: A challenge to the official timeline, alleging the crisis was manufactured to deploy a pre-engineered global response.
  2. Flawed Data Protocols: Claims that hospital protocols, inappropriate mass ventilation, and a failure to treat secondary bacterial infections heavily distorted the true data.
  3. The Ultimate Motive: A highly controversial warning that the long-term goal of these injections ties into global population and fertility control.


Whether you agree or disagree, when a scientist with nearly two decades of executive experience at the top of Big Pharma risks everything to speak out, it forces us to look past the mainstream headlines and think critically. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More coffee please!

The divorce rate is around 50%.
And the marriage?  Mostly seems to be about the picture perfect wedding... the bride... the dress... the ring... the honeymoon photos for their social media... but not the marriage.
So many in the 35 and under age group right now aren't even bothering to get married.  Just date, have sex with numerous people, live together, have kids together with numerous people and move on.  Which is a whole other topic.

I saw this while scrolling some social media and stopped to listen... very good points.
You aren't just marrying that 'person' but all their habits and personality traits too.  :)

 

 

 Interesting.  Sounds a lot like the Clintons.  And Obama (on a smaller scale so far).

 

 
In the three years immediately following the assassination of President Kennedy, a documented pattern emerged among the people identified as material witnesses to the events surrounding his death.

103 of them died under circumstances that investigators, researchers, and journalists described as suspicious, premature, or violent — at rates significantly above what normal actuarial tables would predict for a defined group of people in that age range and demographic.

In 1967, the London Sunday Times commissioned a professional British actuary — an expert in statistical probability whose specific professional function is calculating the likelihood of events within defined populations — to analyze this pattern mathematically. The calculation the actuary produced: the statistical probability of that many material witnesses in a defined group dying in that specific three-year timeframe was approximately one in 100,000,000,000,000. One in one hundred thousand trillion.

The London Sunday Times published the calculation as part of an investigative feature.

The story was subsequently retracted. The Sunday Times later issued a statement saying the original calculation had been based on a misunderstanding of the methodology. Critics of the retraction have noted that it followed significant pressure on the paper's editors. The specific nature and source of that pressure was never publicly disclosed.

The statistical argument itself has been challenged by researchers who dispute aspects of the methodology — those debates are legitimate and ongoing among historians and mathematicians.

But here is what no one disputes: 103 people with documented material connections to the Kennedy assassination died in a defined three-year period. Each death has a name. Each has a documented cause. Each can be researched individually.

A newspaper published a mathematical analysis suggesting the pattern was impossible by chance. Then retracted it. The retraction was never given the same coverage as the original story. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tetnus shots are pretty much just worthless moneymakers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I chuckled.  This is a screenshot from a social media video.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This is 100%.  OMG.
If you haven't done any research and pondering into the evil that is Erica Kirk, you should.
What a background!!!!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
It's always the white guys who want to help people. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
All these trans people committing mass shootings, violence... but, mental illness so, yeah. 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pondering over... diet soda. It's afternoon. And it's hot. And my soda is icy cold.

                                                                                                                                            ...